Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Improve wording in a comment
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2015, 20:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kZdm6a7KDpNyWdLoG5Rc2f-1fCRk1pkg8U2RD3azotkBg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAHGBnuO3wgE_pLu1jcEyExhrzd+Fk_0Uqs23pFgf1NSZpUxVfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Sebastian Schuberth > <sschuberth@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Is that an improvement? Is the plural of "dup" (used as an >>> abbreviation of "duplicate") "dupes" not "dups"? >> >> My view is that the abbreviation of "duplicate" is not "dup" but >> "dupe", hence the plural "dupes". > > For "duplicate" the noun, that is. For "duplicate" the verb I'd be ok > with "dup" as the abbreviation. "to dup" sounds and looks better than > "to dupe" :-) >
We could also not abbreviate that word to avoid discussion there.