Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] run-command: add {run,start,finish}_command_or_die
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2016, 22:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kYgK4e75G9QWUUGKdTUNm+F1GagJ83uXfWY+1ptQQm2dw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <48970168-ba4b-e125-6624-e4c37b8a7180@kdbg.org>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
> This does not explain why the *complete and detailed* invocation must be > reported.
eh. I tried to say that a report that looks like a *complete and detailed* invocation should be such, and not be misleading (and e.g. miss one out of 5 arguments printed).
I haven't followed this topic at all, so I may be missing some
> cruical detail. (If you say "it must happen" one more time, then I will > believe you, because for me that's simpler than to plough through a flock of > submodule topics. ;-)
It doesn't have to happen; I am trying to come up with a better message.
> > -- Hannes >