Re: [PATCH] strbuf: describe the return value of strbuf_read_file()
- From
Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2016, 05:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFZEwPPd_+9nFPCG51nr5s1XMs5SKXG3O3vbAZmxA-BHvZdFPg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqfusgbv0e.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hey Junio,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> It is easy to be misguided on the return value of the function >> strbuf_read_file(). It does follow the pattern of other standard functions >> for reading files but its better to explicitly specify it. > > Good thing to do; I wonder if we want to explicitly say -1 or > leave it at "negative values are errors", though (my knee-jerk > reaction being "do not over-specify more than absolute minimum > to write callers correctly").
Sure I will re-roll with specifying about negative values as errors.
Regards, Pranit Bauva