git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: "git tag --contains <id>" is too chatty, if <id> is invalid

From
Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 19, 2016, 17:04 UTC
Message-ID
<CAFZEwPP1GwH6a1kLTCn6ETov6YeK-t9PFJ_-wWP2P6v7CObiGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAJj6+1Fcp+Fjx9N6Mon1A5uP-_npnPL1Acu5-cR_bHVfs3EMWA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Chirayu Desai <chirayudesai1@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Hi, I want to work on this as my GSoC micro project.
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:24:31PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> > very first line is "error: malformed object name <id>" which tells all, or ?
>> Yeah, I agree that showing the "-h" help is a bit much.
>> This is a side effect of looking up in the commit in the parse-options
>> callback. It has to signal an error to the option parser, and then the
>> option parser always shows the help on an error.
>> I think we'd need to do one of:
>> 1. call die() in the option-parsing callback (this is probably a bad
>> precedent, as the callbacks might be reused from a place that wants
>> to behave differently)
> I assume you mean parse-options-cb.c:parse_opt_commits() by the callback.
> I see that it is currently used only by commands which have a "--with"
> or "--contains" option,
> and all of them behave the same way, printing the full usage, so a one
> line change in that function would fix it for all of those.
>> 2. have the callback just store the argument string, and then resolve
>> the commit later (and die or whatever if it doesn't exist). This
>> pushes more work onto the caller, but in this case it's all done by
>> the ref-filter code, so it could presumably happen during another
>> part of the ref-filter setup.
> I'm not quire sure how exactly to do that.
>> 3. teach parse-options to accept some specific non-zero return code
>> that means "return an error, but don't show the usage"
> This sounds good, but also the most intrusive of 3.
>> I think any one of those would be a good project for somebody looking to
>> get their feet wet in working on git. I think (2) is the cleanest.
>> -Peff
>
> What would be the best way to proceed with this?

The extract that you posted isn't very clear. I guess posting a link with the previous discussion would be quite helpful as some people don't have the previous emails in the inbox. The archives can be found at http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git .

Previous: Chirayu DesaiNext: Chirayu Desai
Message 2 of 10 in “Re: "git tag --contains <id>" is too chatty, if <id> is invalid”
  1. Chirayu DesaiMar 19, 2016
  2. Pranit BauvaMar 19, 2016
  3. Chirayu DesaiMar 19, 2016
  4. Jeff KingMar 19, 2016
  5. Chirayu DesaiMar 19, 2016
  6. Jeff KingMar 19, 2016
  7. Chirayu DesaiMar 20, 2016
  8. Jeff KingMar 23, 2016
  9. Chirayu DesaiMar 24, 2016
  10. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.