Re: [PATCH v2] refs: make explicit that ref_iterator_peel returns boolean
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
- Date
- May 20, 2021, 09:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFQ2z_OUxrW_m5H_y62=Q_i0Kj3c4=2Kzf4hRwVwp-wGPcGayw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqzgwqwcu1.fsf@gitster.g>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:58 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > Use -1 as error return value throughout. > > So this corresponds to the bottommost step in the series that is > queued as hn/reftable, with the difference at the end of this > message. > > Do you want me to replace that single step with this version and > rebuild the remainder of the topic on top?
Yes.
I'm hoping this can graduate soon, so the hn/reftable topic becomes smaller (I don't know what that means for your organization of the seen branch).
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado