Re: [PATCH v2] refs: make explicit that ref_iterator_peel returns boolean
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:04 AM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > So this corresponds to the bottommost step in the series that is
> > queued as hn/reftable, with the difference at the end of this
> > message.
> >
> > Do you want me to replace that single step with this version and
> > rebuild the remainder of the topic on top?
>
> Yes.
>
> I'm hoping this can graduate soon, so the hn/reftable topic becomes
> smaller (I don't know what that means for your organization of the
> seen branch).
Any update on this? This wasn't queued for next, but I believe it should be.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>