Re: [PATCH v2] t3310: avoid hiding failures from rev-parse in command substitutions
- From
Francesco Paparatto <francescopaparatto@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 5, 2026, 22:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAEaT9_-h2MEshMHoyoW9kWQgt_EfQJXcxWSn+cXTSL4mKME=5w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq5x7a3x9w.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Hmph, did I suggest this? I know Eric had comments on a previous > round, and the improvements in this patch seems to be influenced a > lot stronger by his input than whatever I may have said.
Sorry about the Suggested-by line. I added it because of your earlier comment here:
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqv7fioueg.fsf@gitster.g/
but you're right that the concrete changes in this version were mostly influenced by Eric's review, so I'll drop that trailer.
> On top of what commit is this patch designed to apply?
This patch is based on top of:
b3ec5aec2367262f464a33d6eab7a9f49fd413f1
("t3310: replace test -f/-d with test_path_is_file/test_path_is_dir")I'll reroll and send a v3 of the patch shortly.
Thanks, Francesco