Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2013, #08; Tue, 22)
- From
Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
- Date
- Jan 23, 2013, 13:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAEUsAPaUy5ug0_HPjWDTSnAG0kURhP-1-9nOu9_Tpn5nEv6N_Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130123092858.GJ7498@serenity.lan>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:28 AM, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> In my opinion the incremental import support really is substantially > worse in cvsimport-3 than cvsimport-2. cvsimport-2 looks at the output > of git-for-each-ref to calculate the dates from which to continue each > branch. cvsps cannot be told this information and so the cvsimport-3 > script just takes the date of the last commit on the current branch.
Do you really need a timestamp per branch, though? If you have branches A and B, and B has a commit timestamp 5 minutes after A, you can infer that nothing happened on A for those five minutes, right? So maybe a single timestamp is sufficient, it just may not be picking the right one. Instead cvsimport-3 should compute the latest timestamp across all import branches.
Chris