Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Allow reworking with a file when making hunk decisions

>
> Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > If there is only one file, neither of the options will be
> > available, if we are in the second of three or more file, both '<'
> > and '>' will be available and if we are at the last file, only '<'
> > will be available.
>
> An obvious alternative would be to treat the files as a ring, going
> next from the last one would take you to the first one, etc., but I
> think what you described is just as good.

>
> > This will enable simultaneous hunk decisions between between files.
> > After all decisions have been made in a file, a prompt shows which asks
> > "All hunks decided. What now?" that allows reworking with the file,
> > moving to the next or previous file as the case may be.
>
> I forgot to mention this in the previous review, but this would be a
> change that existing users may be surprised by.  We _might_ need to
> introduce a flag to enable this as a new and optional feature.

>
> > The decision to use 'q' as a submit is because after some or all
> > the decisions have been made in a file, 'q' submits them as is
> > even though in the `help_patch_text` it say `q` will not stage the
> > current hunk and all hunks after it.
>
> The users do need to _knowingly_ leave some hunks undecided and
> apply what they already decided to use, and I think 'q' is an
> appropriate option to use.  It is what the current system does,
> and I do not think it changes with this new feature.