Re: [PATCH 00/11] nd/worktree-move update

From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 2, 2017, 11:22 UTC
Message-ID: <CACsJy8CBG_a_nX_syXKrdG2-ren=NO9CNxe6tm94FGnEo1HZLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702021136210.3496@virtualbox>

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

Show 33 quoted lines

> Hi Duy,
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> >> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...]
>> >> >
>> >> > Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussions... Could you remind
>> >> > me which patch is supposed to fix my continuous reflog corruption?
>> >>
>> >> The corruption caused by git-gc? It's not fixed. All the changes in
>> >> this series is shown here.
>> >
>> > Oh sorry, I meant to ask "and if it is not in this patch series, would you
>> > mind pointing me at the patch series that has that fix?"
>>
>> You meant this one [1]? There is nothing substantial since then.
>>
>> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/%3C20160601104519.16563-1-pclouds@gmail.com%3E/
>
> I guess I mean that.
>
> Given that this results in real data loss, it is surprising that this has
> not made it even into `pu` yet!

I could rebase and clean it up a bit if you need it, but I don't think it'll end up in 'pu' or anywhere near since Junio wanted a cleaner approach [1]. That means (as far as I can see) a lot more work around refs store and backend area before it's ready to handle "get refs from this worktree store" (or "get refs from every reachable stores").

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqshwwzyee.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/

-- 
Duy