Re: check-attr doesn't respect recursive definitions

From

Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>

Date

Apr 5, 2013, 02:09 UTC

Message-ID

<CACsJy8B9s0=EFUazrb9MhDJiou_dSzx6kezFCET+w+jUdBMv=A@mail.gmail.com>

In-Reply-To

<slrnkldd3g.1l4.jan@majutsushi.net>

On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jan Larres <jan@majutsushi.net> wrote:

> I would expect the last command to also report 'set'. I've also tried
> other patterns like 'foo/' and 'foo*', but it didn't make any
> difference.