Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2017, #04; Fri, 18)

From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 22, 2017, 08:49 UTC
Message-ID: <CACsJy8AM+dr_in_hW3y6APUo-cKsg+3sAZg9-7+02ZspSZcf=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq60dkbma1.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 21 quoted lines

> [Discarded]
>
> * nd/prune-in-worktree (2017-04-24) 12 commits
>  . rev-list: expose and document --single-worktree
>  . revision.c: --reflog add HEAD reflog from all worktrees
>  . files-backend: make reflog iterator go through per-worktree reflog
>  . revision.c: --all adds HEAD from all worktrees
>  . refs: remove dead for_each_*_submodule()
>  . revision.c: use refs_for_each*() instead of for_each_*_submodule()
>  . refs: add refs_head_ref()
>  . refs: move submodule slash stripping code to get_submodule_ref_store
>  . refs.c: refactor get_submodule_ref_store(), share common free block
>  . revision.c: --indexed-objects add objects from all worktrees
>  . revision.c: refactor add_index_objects_to_pending()
>  . revision.h: new flag in struct rev_info wrt. worktree-related refs
>
>  "git gc" and friends when multiple worktrees are used off of a
>  single repository did not consider the index and per-worktree refs
>  of other worktrees as the root for reachability traversal, making
>  objects that are in use only in other worktrees to be subject to
>  garbage collection.

I'm back and will try to continue this. Is it discarded because of lack of progress, or because the problem is already fixed some other way? A quick "git log --oneline" on important files has not revealed anything.

-- 
Duy