Re: About my git workflow; maybe it's useful for others
- From
Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 22, 2015, 19:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACnwZYcD7ryJqM+85wxka+ViqOfy51bOgyetUEdgY1pcQPJv=A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79ka1U8SP-7b_Jbm--1j1sz0iHKd+v-WNCASAXH+kystefA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> IMO, sending email is the easiest part. >> >> The hard begins when you have to edit your patch and resend with the >> reviewers' feedback incorporated. For me that is the most tricky and >> hard part to get right, specially when using GMail as an email client. >> >> How do you handle that part of the process? > > I try to have as much in git as possible. > > So when the reviews trickle in, I change my commits (in git) accordingly > via rebase and edit and lots of fixup commits. I use git notes > to keep track of changes from one version to another. > > Having the "changes of the changes" in the git notes, I am (in theory) > always able to kick out a new version of the patch series with > > rm 00* # delete old patches > git format-patch --notes --coverletter somebranch...HEAD > edit 0000-cover-letter.patch > git send-email 00* --to=mailing list --to=John@doe.org --cc=Max@Mustermann.de >
Is that capable of keeping the next patch set in the same thread that started when you sent the initial patch? Otherwise things get disconnected.
-- Thiago Farina