Re: I have end-of-lifed cvsps
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2013, 16:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACPiFC+W-RiO-YL=Wgs7YzV=z-p97ehfA+64j5F2KbayPAQm8w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131218162710.GA3573@thyrsus.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote:
>> Anyway I hope that incremental CVS import would be needed less >> and less as CVS is replaced by any more modern version control system. > > I agree. I have never understood why people on this list are attached to it.
I think I have answered this question already once in this thread, and a few times in similar threads with Eric in the past.
People track CVS repos that they have not control over. Smart programmers forced to work with a corporate CVS repo. It happens also with SVN, and witness the popularity of git-svn which can sanely interact with an "active" svn repo.
This is a valid use case. Hard (impossible?) to support. But there should be no surprise as to its reasons.
cheers,
m
-- martin.langhoff@gmail.com - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff