Re: git commit-tree does not honor commit.gpgSign config
- From
- Evan Grim <evangrim@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 28, 2020, 19:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABX4Un3euDWeGr_2DegS3xyoD8VJ23rb9+bj3hBkWS6KZH9FhA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd025n3ik.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Thank you for that context. I came across this when I used `git-subtree` and was surprised the commits it created weren't signed. Would it be appropriate to look into patching `git-subtree` to honor the configuration option?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:46 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > Evan Grim <evangrim@gmail.com> writes: > > > Is it a bug that `git-commit-tree` doesn't honor the `commit.gpgSign` > > configuration option? > > It would be a bug if it did, as a low level plumbing tool to build > scripts around, it would not want its behaviour to be affected by > end-user configuration (rather, scripts that are written using these > plumbing command do want to handle end-user customization their own > ways).