From: Evan Grim <evangrim@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:42:43 GMT
Subject: Re: git commit-tree does not honor commit.gpgSign config
Message-ID: <CABX4Un3euDWeGr_2DegS3xyoD8VJ23rb9+bj3hBkWS6KZH9FhA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqd025n3ik.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

Thank you for that context.  I came across this when I used
`git-subtree` and was surprised the commits it created weren't signed.
Would it be appropriate to look into patching `git-subtree` to honor
the configuration option?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:46 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Evan Grim <evangrim@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Is it a bug that `git-commit-tree` doesn't honor the `commit.gpgSign`
> > configuration option?
>
> It would be a bug if it did, as a low level plumbing tool to build
> scripts around, it would not want its behaviour to be affected by
> end-user configuration (rather, scripts that are written using these
> plumbing command do want to handle end-user customization their own
> ways).