Re: [PATCH 5/5] rebase: use 'git stash store' to simplify logic
- From
Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2013, 12:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABURp0rEzKwE__Sg+Z66iOo7qZn0NKPzPuuhb52taBs8zyga=Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1371205924-8982-6-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> rebase has no reason to know about the implementation of the stash. In
> the case when applying the autostash results in conflicts, replace the
> relevant code in finish_rebase () to simply call 'git stash store'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
> ---
> git-rebase.sh | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
> index d0c11a9..bf37259 100755
> --- a/git-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase.sh
> @@ -153,11 +153,7 @@ finish_rebase () {
> then
> echo "$(gettext 'Applied autostash.')"
> else
> - ref_stash=refs/stash &&
> - >>"$GIT_DIR/logs/$ref_stash" &&
> - git update-ref -m "autostash" $ref_stash $stash_sha1 ||
> - die "$(eval_gettext 'Cannot store $stash_sha1')"
> -
> + git stash store -m "autostash" -e "Cannot store $stash_sha1." $stash_sha1nit: adds a period where there was not one previously.
Maybe this doesn't matter so much since this code is new anyway. But showing a period after sha1 seems wrong, too. Or maybe I am confused again. Does eval_gettext routinely add a period to the end of translated strings?
Show 10 quoted lines
> gettext 'Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. > Your changes are safe in the stash. > You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" it at any time. > -- > 1.8.3.1.383.g0d5ad6b > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html