Re: [PATCH] date.c: allow ISO 8601 reduced precision times

>
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Do you have any suggestions about how I can better alleviate your
> >> concerns?  I don't think there are real regressions here and I tried
> >> to explain why.
> >
> > Other than "including it in a released version and waiting for
> > people to scream", I do not think there is.  The "next" branch was
> > meant to be a test ground for these new features by letting
> > volunteer users to use it in their everyday development, and the
> > hope was that we can catch regressions by cooking risky topics
> > longer than usual in there, but we haven't been very successful, I
> > have to say.
> >
> > Thanks.  Let's queue it and see what happens.
>
> Actually, let's not queue it as-is, because it seems to break many
> tests for me.  I won't have time to take further look myself before
> later in the week when I come back online again, though.