From: Phil Hord Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 18:30:10 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] date.c: allow ISO 8601 reduced precision times Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:16 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Phil Hord writes: > > > >> Do you have any suggestions about how I can better alleviate your > >> concerns? I don't think there are real regressions here and I tried > >> to explain why. > > > > Other than "including it in a released version and waiting for > > people to scream", I do not think there is. The "next" branch was > > meant to be a test ground for these new features by letting > > volunteer users to use it in their everyday development, and the > > hope was that we can catch regressions by cooking risky topics > > longer than usual in there, but we haven't been very successful, I > > have to say. > > > > Thanks. Let's queue it and see what happens. > > Actually, let's not queue it as-is, because it seems to break many > tests for me. I won't have time to take further look myself before > later in the week when I come back online again, though. Oh, wow. For me as well. I thought I ran all the tests before finishing up, but I guess I was too focused on the single test module. I apologize for the oversight.