git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Test failure in t9814-git-p4-rename.sh - my environment or bad test?

From
CBChristoph Bonitz <ml.christophbonitz@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 23, 2014, 21:26 UTC
Message-ID
<CABUJjW8rjQNhfG6yw=6FaMoqMzudcrhV1RaZfQK94yxT64oZng@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Choosing any of these as the copy source is fine" is a sensible way
> to fix the problem with this test.  Would it be a better solution to
> avoid having multiple/ambiguous copy source candidates in the first
> place, by the way?

I agree that this would be the best solution, although I feel more confident making a less invasive change first.

Thanks, Christoph

Message 1 of 1 in “Re: Test failure in t9814-git-p4-rename.sh - my environment or bad test?”
  1. Christoph BonitzJul 23, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.