On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Choosing any of these as the copy source is fine" is a sensible way > to fix the problem with this test. Would it be a better solution to > avoid having multiple/ambiguous copy source candidates in the first > place, by the way?
I agree that this would be the best solution, although I feel more confident making a less invasive change first.
Thanks, Christoph