git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v3] sequencer: do not squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflicts

From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 19, 2018, 14:29 UTC
Message-ID
<CABPp-BHFuqh1KVPod+chZD=AKGVBd_apOt6F9oTaZ0ZA66G03Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20180619124651.17425-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> wrote:
Show 37 quoted lines
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> Ever since commit 18633e1a22 ("rebase -i: use the rebase--helper builtin",
> 2017-02-09), when a commit marked as 'reword' in an interactive rebase
> has conflicts and fails to apply, when the rebase is resumed that commit
> will be squashed into its parent with its commit message taken.
>
> The issue can be understood better by looking at commit 56dc3ab04b
> ("sequencer (rebase -i): implement the 'edit' command", 2017-01-02), which
> introduced error_with_patch() for the edit command.  For the edit command,
> it needs to stop the rebase whether or not the patch applies cleanly.  If
> the patch does apply cleanly, then when it resumes it knows it needs to
> amend all changes into the previous commit.  If it does not apply cleanly,
> then the changes should not be amended.  Thus, it passes !res (success of
> applying the 'edit' commit) to error_with_patch() for the to_amend flag.
>
> The problematic line of code actually came from commit 04efc8b57c
> ("sequencer (rebase -i): implement the 'reword' command", 2017-01-02).
> Note that to get to this point in the code:
>   * !!res (i.e. patch application failed)
>   * item->command < TODO_SQUASH
>   * item->command != TODO_EDIT
>   * !is_fixup(item->command) [i.e. not squash or fixup]
> So that means this can only be a failed patch application that is either a
> pick, revert, or reword.  We only need to amend HEAD when rewording the
> root commit or a commit that has been fast-forwarded, for any of the other
> cases we want a new commit, so we should not set the to_amend flag.
>
> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> Original-patch-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
>
> I wasn't really sure what to do about the authorship.  This is
> Elijah's patch, with the message tweaked, fixed up with a corrected
> version of Johannes' code and a couple of new tests by my for picking
> and rewording the root commit when it has untracked file confilcts.

Yeah, this one was a little challenging on authorship. What you've done here is fine from my angle; thanks for catching the other important cases I missed.

Junio: As a reminder, this is a bugfix for a regression that appeared
in git 2.13.0; it is not new to the 2.18 cycle.

[As an aside, I know there are multiple other outstanding emails for me to respond to, unrelated to this patch. I'll try to get some time in the next day or two to respond. Just responding to this one since Junio mentioned picking it up for 2.18.]

Show 138 quoted lines
>  sequencer.c                   | 23 ++++++++++++++---
>  t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh      | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 4034c0461b..7bf2b62727 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -3214,10 +3214,27 @@ static int pick_commits(struct todo_list *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
>                                         intend_to_amend();
>                                 return error_failed_squash(item->commit, opts,
>                                         item->arg_len, item->arg);
> -                       } else if (res && is_rebase_i(opts) && item->commit)
> +                       } else if (res && is_rebase_i(opts) && item->commit) {
> +                               int to_amend = 0;
> +                               struct object_id oid;
> +
> +                               /*
> +                                * If we are rewording and have either
> +                                * fast-forwarded already, or are about to
> +                                * create a new root commit, we want to amend,
> +                                * otherwise we do not.
> +                                */
> +                               if (item->command == TODO_REWORD &&
> +                                   !get_oid("HEAD", &oid) &&
> +                                   (!oidcmp(&item->commit->object.oid, &oid) ||
> +                                    (opts->have_squash_onto &&
> +                                     !oidcmp(&opts->squash_onto, &oid))))
> +                                       to_amend = 1;
> +
>                                 return res | error_with_patch(item->commit,
> -                                       item->arg, item->arg_len, opts, res,
> -                                       item->command == TODO_REWORD);
> +                                               item->arg, item->arg_len, opts,
> +                                               res, to_amend);
> +                       }
>                 } else if (item->command == TODO_EXEC) {
>                         char *end_of_arg = (char *)(item->arg + item->arg_len);
>                         int saved = *end_of_arg;
> diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> index e500d7c320..3786879e80 100755
> --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> @@ -980,7 +980,35 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i --root reword root commit' '
>         git show HEAD^ | grep "A changed"
>  '
>
> +test_expect_success 'rebase -i --root when root has untracked file confilct' '
> +       test_when_finished "reset_rebase" &&
> +       git checkout -b failing-root-pick A &&
> +       echo x >file2 &&
> +       git rm file1 &&
> +       git commit -m "remove file 1 add file 2" &&
> +       echo z >file1 &&
> +       set_fake_editor &&
> +       test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES="1 2" git rebase -i --root &&
> +       rm file1 &&
> +       git rebase --continue &&
> +       test "$(git log -1 --format=%B)" = "remove file 1 add file 2" &&
> +       test "$(git rev-list --count HEAD)" = 2
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'rebase -i --root reword root when root has untracked file conflict' '
> +       test_when_finished "reset_rebase" &&
> +       echo z>file1 &&
> +       set_fake_editor &&
> +       test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES="reword 1 2" \
> +               FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE="Modified A" git rebase -i --root &&
> +       rm file1 &&
> +       FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE="Reworded A" git rebase --continue &&
> +       test "$(git log -1 --format=%B HEAD^)" = "Reworded A" &&
> +       test "$(git rev-list --count HEAD)" = 2
> +'
> +
>  test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'rebase --edit-todo does not work on non-interactive rebase' '
> +       git checkout reword-root-branch &&
>         git reset --hard &&
>         git checkout conflict-branch &&
>         set_fake_editor &&
> diff --git a/t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh b/t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000..6963750794
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='git rebase interactive with rewording'
> +
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-rebase.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success 'setup' '
> +       test_commit master file-1 test &&
> +
> +       git checkout -b stuff &&
> +
> +       test_commit feature_a file-2 aaa &&
> +       test_commit feature_b file-2 ddd
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'reword without issues functions as intended' '
> +       test_when_finished "reset_rebase" &&
> +
> +       git checkout stuff^0 &&
> +
> +       set_fake_editor &&
> +       FAKE_LINES="pick 1 reword 2" FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE="feature_b_reworded" \
> +               git rebase -i -v master &&
> +
> +       test "$(git log -1 --format=%B)" = "feature_b_reworded" &&
> +       test $(git rev-list --count HEAD) = 3
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'reword after a conflict preserves commit' '
> +       test_when_finished "reset_rebase" &&
> +
> +       git checkout stuff^0 &&
> +
> +       set_fake_editor &&
> +       test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES="reword 2" \
> +               git rebase -i -v master &&
> +
> +       git checkout --theirs file-2 &&
> +       git add file-2 &&
> +       FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE="feature_b_reworded" git rebase --continue &&
> +
> +       test "$(git log -1 --format=%B)" = "feature_b_reworded" &&
> +       test $(git rev-list --count HEAD) = 2
> +'
> +
> +test_done
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Previous: Phillip WoodNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 14 of 19 in “[BUG] git-rebase: reword squashes commits in case of merge-conflicts”
  1. chJun 11, 2018
  2. Jeff KingJun 12, 2018
  3. chJun 15, 2018
  4. Elijah NewrenJun 16, 2018
  5. Eric SunshineJun 17, 2018
  6. sequencer: do not squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflictsElijah Newren, Jun 17, 2018
  7. Phillip WoodJun 17, 2018
  8. Johannes SchindelinJun 17, 2018
  9. Phillip WoodJun 18, 2018
  10. Junio C HamanoJun 18, 2018
  11. Johannes SchindelinJun 18, 2018
  12. Phillip WoodJun 19, 2018
  13. sequencer: do not squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflictsPhillip Wood, Jun 19, 2018
  14. Elijah NewrenJun 19, 2018
  15. Junio C HamanoJun 19, 2018
  16. t/lib-rebase.sh: support explicit 'pick' commands in 'fake_editor.sh'SZEDER Gábor, Aug 23, 2018
  17. Junio C HamanoAug 23, 2018
  18. Johannes SchindelinAug 23, 2018
  19. Johannes SchindelinJun 17, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.