Re: [PATCH 2/7] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 5:23 PM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 41 quoted lines
>
> Hi Chirstian
>
> Thanks for taking a look at this series
>
> On 07/04/2022 14:49, Christian Couder wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 6:12 AM Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
> > <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> >>
> >> The reflog message for a conflict resolution committed by "rebase
> >> --continue" looks like
> >>
> >> rebase (continue): commit subject line
> >>
> >> Unfortunately the reflog message each subsequent pick look like
> >>
> >> rebase (continue) (pick): commit subject line
> >>
> >> Fix this by setting the reflog message for "rebase --continue" in
> >> sequencer_continue() so it does not affect subsequent commits. This
> >> introduces a memory leak similar to the one leaking GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
> >> in pick_commits(). Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
> >> stops the sequencer calling setenv().
> >
> > Yeah, it looks like we will leak only a small string.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> >> ---
> >> builtin/rebase.c | 2 -
> >> sequencer.c | 5 ++
> >> t/t3406-rebase-message.sh | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >
> > The changes to the test script look a bit involved and aren't
> > explained in the commit message. I wonder if some of those changes
> > could have been made in a preparatory commit.
>
> That's a good point. For some reason when I put the series together I
> thought it would be tricky to do that without the fixes in this commit
> but that is not actually the case so I'll split the test changes out.
That would be very nice; I'd like to see it split out too.