Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing

> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>>> Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
>>>> stops the sequencer calling setenv().
>>> If it gets fixed in a future step in the same series, that is a
>>> different matter, but if it is easy enough not to deliberately
>>> introduce a new leak, we'd prefer to do so.
>>
>> It's a couple of patches to fix which are more or less finished, I'm
>> planning to send them once this series is in next.
> 
> So we will do the "add a known breakage of the same kind as there
> exists others, and then later fix them all up, including the one
> that is added by this series, because fixes are non-trivial and this
> topic is easier to finish if we allowed to add a known breakage"
> approach?  Just making sure it is what you plan to do.