Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b
- From
Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2013, 23:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+sFfMdajb3euvxANyXhbk-XhYASdH+7spW1r8tXz16kU8syEw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130128031424.GK8206@elie.Belkin>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Brandon Casey wrote:
>
>> --- a/sequencer.c
>> +++ b/sequencer.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1096,10 +1117,16 @@ void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer)
>> strbuf_addch(&sob, '\n');
>> for (i = msgbuf->len - 1 - ignore_footer; i > 0 && msgbuf->buf[i - 1] != '\n'; i--)
>> ; /* do nothing */
>> - if (prefixcmp(msgbuf->buf + i, sob.buf)) {
>> - if (!i || !has_conforming_footer(msgbuf, ignore_footer))
>> - strbuf_splice(msgbuf, msgbuf->len - ignore_footer, 0, "\n", 1);
>> - strbuf_splice(msgbuf, msgbuf->len - ignore_footer, 0, sob.buf, sob.len);
>> - }
>> +
>> + if (i)
>> + has_footer = has_conforming_footer(msgbuf, &sob, ignore_footer);
>
> Is this "if (i)" test needed? I'd expect that if the message has no newlines,
> has_conforming_footer() would notice that and return 0.Thanks for pointing out this awkwardness. It should be pushed into has_conforming_footer().
-Brandon