Re: [PATCH] worktree: add --quiet option

> Hi Elia
>
> On 7 August 2018 at 15:21, Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add the '--quiet' option to git worktree add,
>> as for the other git commands.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/git-worktree.txt |  4 +++-
>>  builtin/worktree.c             | 11 +++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
>> index 9c26be40f..508cde55c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/git-worktree.txt
>> @@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ Unlock a working tree, allowing it to be pruned, moved or deleted.
>>
>>  OPTIONS
>>  -------
>> -
>
> Grepping through Documentation/, it is clear that we sometimes have a
> blank line here, sometimes not. I'm not sure what to make of that.
>
>> +-q::
>> +--quiet::
>> +       With 'add', suppress feedback messages.
>>  -f::
>
> But I do think that for consistency, we'd prefer a blank line before `-f::`.
>
> Both the commit message and this documentation makes me wonder if this
> focuses on "add" because it's the only subcommand where `--quiet` makes
> sense, conceptually, or because this is where you happen to need it
> personally, or due to some other $reason. Could you say something more
> about this?
>
> I'm not a worktree power-user, so please forgive my ignorance...
>
>> @@ -315,6 +316,9 @@ static int add_worktree(const char *path, const char *refname,
>>                 cp.argv = NULL;
>>                 argv_array_clear(&cp.args);
>>                 argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "reset", "--hard", NULL);
>> +               if (opts->quiet)
>> +                       argv_array_push(&cp.args, "--quiet");
>> +               printf("%s\n","soo qia");
>
> This last line looks like debug cruft.
>
>> @@ -437,6 +441,7 @@ static int add(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
>>                 OPT_BOOL(0, "detach", &opts.detach, N_("detach HEAD at named commit")),
>>                 OPT_BOOL(0, "checkout", &opts.checkout, N_("populate the new working tree")),
>>                 OPT_BOOL(0, "lock", &opts.keep_locked, N_("keep the new working tree locked")),
>> +               OPT__QUIET(&opts.quiet, N_("suppress progress reporting")),
>
> This matches other users. Good.
>
> I did some simple testing and this appears to be quite quiet, modulo
> the "soo qia" that I already mentioned. Could you add a test to
> demonstrate the quietness and to keep it from regressing? Something like
> `git worktree add ../foo >out && test_must_be_empty out" in e.g.,
> t2025-worktree-add.sh might do the trick (capture stderr as well?).
>
> Hope this helps
> Martin