Re: Signed tags in octopus merge..
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2012, 23:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+55aFzZXSCt1AwOotMZJ+GcNcJKL2OcsPOtaZ3=cvraJ=PD+Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJ8aY1Hi47uyYSjAmtXfDEqgyc8T21WqXdEA0kGS7SQKxQ5b5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jacob Helwig <jacob@technosorcery.net> wrote:
> > My immediate thought regarding the "side branch #1" version is not > wanting to have to do the math (even though it's a simple n+1)
"Math is hard, let's go shopping".
But I think even barbie could do the "add one" thing. That said, I think the current thing is already more than good enough, and I don't think it's at all confusing to talk about "parent #2". In fact, I think it's more obvious than "side branch #1".
Linus