Re: Signed tags in octopus merge..
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2012, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vobu3uusw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+55aFzRN2F5PZDZPRmbj9occZwA6E6Pi+S+M_Qq2EfS6sctyA@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Just a heads-up and congrats: octopus merges of signed tags work well, > and did exactly the RightThing(tm), both at merge time and with > "--show-signature". > > I knew it was supposed to work, but I have to admit that I was a bit > apprehensive about it when I tried. > > Current top-of-head (commit 81d48f0aee54) in the kernel, in case you care.
I looked at it again, and it makes me wonder if we should further reword it to say "side branch #1, tagged 'devicetree-for-linus'" instead of the current "parent #2, tagged 'devicetree-for-linus'". It looks very weird to start counting from #2, when we know we will never show #1 there.