Re: Merging to and from non-current branches.
- From
- lists@mgreg.com <lists@mgreg.com>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2009, 01:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <C766A4F9-C12B-4F94-8B24-9BD3665B70E8@mgreg.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <81b0412b0908051428g40b7678ewc549f079abbd03ee@mail.gmail.com>
On Aug 5, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Alex Riesen wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 04:48, lists@mgreg.com<lists@mgreg.com> wrote: >> I appreciate your post. I understand what you're saying, and I'm >> not so >> much concerned about the logistics of what need to occur so much as >> a single >> command to intuitively handle it. I've been doing a great deal of >> incremental development lately and it becomes rather tedious to >> have to >> checkout master, merge dev, re-checkout dev and proceed. I'm not >> sure why >> this isn't currently possible with a single command. > > Because no one needed this sequence of commands for long enough.
As I said, I understand what is being said, but in IMHO it would seem that a merge of that nature would be immediately desirable. Think of it more as a local "push". I'm never a fan of "because it hasn't be done means it shouldn't be". I realize that's not exactly what you're saying though. Anyway, I absolutely appreciate the post, and may very well post the script.
Best,
Michael