Re: Merging to and from non-current branches.
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2009, 02:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86y6pxsn6h.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <C766A4F9-C12B-4F94-8B24-9BD3665B70E8@mgreg.com>
>>>>> "mgreg" == lists@mgreg com <lists@mgreg.com> writes:
mgreg> As I said, I understand what is being said, but in IMHO it would seem mgreg> that a merge of that nature would be immediately desirable. Think of mgreg> it more as a local "push". I'm never a fan of "because it hasn't be mgreg> done means it shouldn't be". I realize that's not exactly what you're mgreg> saying though. Anyway, I absolutely appreciate the post, and may very mgreg> well post the script.
In other words, you'd be happy with it if it was just a fast-forward only?
Because the moment you might have conflicts, that *has* to be the workdir so you can resolve those conflicts. Dunno why this is so hard to grok.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion