Re: Rollback of git commands
- From
Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2007, 04:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BAYC1-PASMTP101A96ADE42981D2708652AE770@CEZ.ICE>
- In-Reply-To
- <9e4733910711272037r2ce3ed01y31ec8531f5803efe@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, November 27, 2007 11:37 pm, Jon Smirl said:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Patch management is an important part of the work flow. I would hope > that git implements patch management as a core feature in future > versions. stgit/guilt/quilt are valuable since they blazed the trail > and figured out what commands are useful. As time passes these > features can become more highly integrated into core git.
Think this is a separate topic from where we started though.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Of course you've never screwed up a repository using git commands, > right? I've messed up plenty. A good way to mess up a repo is to get > the data in .git/* out of sync with what is in the repo. I'm getting > good enough with git that I can fix most mess up with a few edits, but > it took me two years to get to that point. Rolling back to a check > point is way easier. User error and a command failing are both equally > valid ways to mess up a repo.
What are you looking for that reflogs don't already handle?
Cheers, Sean