Re: Rollback of git commands

> On Tue, November 27, 2007 11:37 pm, Jon Smirl said:
>
> > Patch management is an important part of the work flow. I would hope
> > that git implements patch management as a core feature in future
> > versions. stgit/guilt/quilt are valuable since they blazed the trail
> > and figured out what commands are useful. As time passes these
> > features can become more highly integrated into core git.
>
> Think this is a separate topic from where we started though.
>
> > Of course you've never screwed up a repository using git commands,
> > right? I've messed up plenty. A good way to mess up a repo is to get
> > the data in .git/* out of sync with what is in the repo. I'm getting
> > good enough with git that I can fix most mess up with a few edits, but
> > it took me two years to get to that point. Rolling back to a check
> > point is way easier. User error and a command failing are both equally
> > valid ways to mess up a repo.
>
> What are you looking for that reflogs don't already handle?

>
> Cheers,
> Sean
>
>