Re: Two gitweb feature requests
- From
sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2006, 16:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BAYC1-PASMTP0240D4E75F0F6EE37BA4EBAEB20@CEZ.ICE>
- In-Reply-To
- <1146144425.11909.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:05 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> First... When publishing trees, I currently give both the git:// URL for > people who want to pull the tree, and the http:// URL to gitweb for > those who just want to browse. > > It would be useful if I could get away with giving just one URL -- > probably the http:// one to gitweb. If gitweb were to have a mode in > which it gave a referral to the git:// URL, and if the git tools would > use that, then that would work well.
This sounds like a good idea.
> Secondly, it would be useful if gitweb would list the branches in a > repository and allow each of them to be viewed in the same way as it > does the master branch.
At the bottom of the Summary page it already lists the branches, underneath the tags.
Sean