From: sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:26:30 GMT
Subject: Re: Two gitweb feature requests
Message-ID: <BAYC1-PASMTP0240D4E75F0F6EE37BA4EBAEB20@CEZ.ICE>
In-Reply-To: <1146144425.11909.450.camel@pmac.infradead.org>

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:05 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:

> First... When publishing trees, I currently give both the git:// URL for
> people who want to pull the tree, and the http:// URL to gitweb for
> those who just want to browse.
> 
> It would be useful if I could get away with giving just one URL --
> probably the http:// one to gitweb. If gitweb were to have a mode in
> which it gave a referral to the git:// URL, and if the git tools would
> use that, then that would work well.

This sounds like a good idea.

> Secondly, it would be useful if gitweb would list the branches in a
> repository and allow each of them to be viewed in the same way as it
> does the master branch.

At the bottom of the Summary page it already lists the branches,
underneath the tags.

Sean