Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] protobuf: minimal implementation for compact in-memory structures
- From
David Barr <davidbarr@google.com>
- Date
- Jun 24, 2011, 14:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTimov2ZFYZjU4=CXPE8yjH8cMs3HCg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7voc1p64ap.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio,
Sorry for the repeat, accidentally sent as HTML, rejected by the list.
On Thursday, June 23, 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote: David Barr <davidbarr@google.com> writes:
> One struct to capture all types, just 4 methods: decode_message, > encode_message, sizeof_message, hash_field.
Adding to the review from yesterday, hash_field() looked quite out of place. If you are going to implement a hash table that holds protobuf objects in a separate file/module, I would imagine the function belongs there, not here.
I agree completely, another artifact of refactoring from experimental code.
-- David Barr