Re: rebasing branch with reverted patches
- From
- Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2011, 09:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BANLkTimbSes-B8zK2a2t1Jp1v+29HdNvqw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DAD4B0F.9030908@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Francis Moreau venit, vidit, dixit 19.04.2011 09:32: >> Hello, >> >> I'm wondering if it would be a good idea for git rebase to allow not >> rebasing reverted patch which are part of the rebased branch. >> >> For example I'm currently rebasing my branch 'devel' onto master. This >> branch have several commits and specially one called A and another one >> called A' which reverts A. >> >> When rebasing 'devel' branch, rebase could try to drop both A and A'. >> >> What do you think ? >> >> BTW is there a way to do this currently ? > > You can do this with "rebase -i" by removing A and A' from the commit > list (or squashing them or dealing with them in whatever way you like).
Of course, but my point was to make this automatically...
-- Francis