git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: rebasing branch with reverted patches

From
FMFrancis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date
Apr 19, 2011, 09:19 UTC
Message-ID
<BANLkTi=2LZGdZ7+QfVbd3g9dTKEcjNwsHw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<4DAD52BA.5000206@op5.se>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>
> That would be akin to removing in-code comments of why it's a bad idea
> to implement a particular solution in a particular way, and it also
> removes the capability of reverting the revert (ie, re-doing the change)
> at a later time when stability can be sacrificed temporarily.

That's right but OTOH I use git-rebase for development stuff where all correct points you raised don't apply.

-- 
Francis
Previous: Andreas EricssonNext: Santi Béjar
Message 5 of 7 in “rebasing branch with reverted patches”
  1. Francis MoreauApr 19, 2011
  2. Michael J GruberApr 19, 2011
  3. Francis MoreauApr 19, 2011
  4. Andreas EricssonApr 19, 2011
  5. Francis MoreauApr 19, 2011
  6. Santi BéjarApr 19, 2011
  7. Francis MoreauApr 19, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.