Re: [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan

From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: May 26, 2011, 17:05 UTC
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ifQYFbq-ntpVF=1+sjv-wdkEJ-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=FkK=k6OavQtqMRvPCZ7nc+iKtwQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Junio,

Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> And with that, this would no longer depend on the (valuable enough on
>> their own terms) patches 1 and 2 so they could be treated as a
>> separate series, no?
>
> Yes, but I'd like to keep 1 and 2 in this series, if that's alright.
> Another series will have to take care of error handling more
> extensively.
> With a few tests, would it be useful to get this series merged in? It
> implements '--abort', which is already useful.

There's a good way to create a separation between patches 1-2, and the
rest- thanks to Jonathan's suggestion on IRC.
Junio: Would you like to merge just the first two patches? I'll
continue working on the rest, and try to come up with something useful
to merge in another week or two.

-- Ram