git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #06; Tue, 21)

From
Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Date
Dec 22, 2010, 23:08 UTC
Message-ID
<AANLkTini5cxGi2vZeDEkGWxw5BXa3ZK0jqzG+Dy2oQ73@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<7vvd2l4jpx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> * tf/commit-list-prefix (2010-11-26) 1 commit
>>>  (merged to 'next' on 2010-12-21 at 16e1351)
>>>  + commit: Add commit_list prefix in two function names.
>>>
>>> This churn
>> Since you said that, can could you drop this patch? I don't mind if
>> you discard this patch since you consider it a CHURN[1].
>>
>>> already introduced an unnecessary conflict.
>> Which conflict? If you say, I could try to fix it.
>>
>>> It is not by itself a biggie, but these things tend to add up.
>>
>> How *these things* add a conflict? This is a new thing to me really.
>
> Look at output from "git show 16e1351 sha1_name.c".
>
> The damage (i.e. my time wasted to deal with the conflict resulting from
> the rename of the function) has already been done.  There is nothing to
> fix.
>
> One thing you _could_ fix is to keep an eye on what are cooking (e.g. the
> diff between maint and pu), and refrain from throwing "trivial clean-up"

That should be the pain of being the maintainer. You have to deal with this, like I have to deal with all the critics too.

> patches that may overlap with them at the list until the dust settles.
The dust never settles in this mailing list.
> That would greatly reduce the annoyance factor.
>
> The same comment applies to your patches to reduce use of alloc_nr().  If
> absolutely nothing else is going on in the project,
Which is impossible, due to the high traffic that this project attracts.
> these are genuinely good clean-up patches, but when other patches that give us real-life benefit are in flight,
Well, I'd say to just ignore it as you have done many times before.
> just having to check if they overlap with whatever
> is cooking now is already annoying.
>
What I can do if you are the ONLY one that has commit access to this project.
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Heiko Voigt
Message 5 of 17 in “What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #06; Tue, 21)”
  1. Junio C HamanoDec 22, 2010
  2. Thiago FarinaDec 22, 2010
  3. Andreas EricssonDec 22, 2010
  4. Junio C HamanoDec 22, 2010
  5. Thiago FarinaDec 22, 2010
  6. Heiko VoigtDec 23, 2010
  7. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 23, 2010
  8. Junio C HamanoDec 23, 2010
  9. Joshua JensenDec 23, 2010
  10. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 24, 2010
  11. Joshua JensenDec 24, 2010
  12. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 25, 2010
  13. Junio C HamanoDec 24, 2010
  14. Joshua JensenDec 24, 2010
  15. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyDec 24, 2010
  16. Thomas RastDec 26, 2010
  17. Junio C HamanoDec 26, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.