Re: [PATCHv3 1/6] Add additional testcases for D/F conflicts
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 8, 2010, 03:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTinVyfWEqJqZgpiXv0hvMLELLb-UThi-0W2izGQc@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vocejt25d.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
Thanks for the thorough reviews!
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> -test_expect_failure 'do not lose a/b-2/c/d in merge (recursive)' ' >> +test_expect_failure 'Handle D/F conflict, do not lose a/b-2/c/d in merge (recursive)' ' > > If you retitle this, you would probably want to retitle the corresponding > test for resolve (the one before this test) the same way.
<snip>
> It may be a good idea to see what resolve does for all these new > tests.
I'd be happy to make these and the other changes you suggested, but I notice that you've already done so in pu with Fixup commits for this and the other patches. Should I squash those in for a resend of the series?
Also, do you want me to split the series as you did with the testsuite addition patches separate from the fixes?
Thanks, Elijah