Re: Patchbombing or not, that is the question
- From
Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 27, 2010, 18:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTinGNURJVdnQjw5BvR1tkoOdCRdgY2poYb8PFH2R@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20101127183421.GA2131@burratino>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >> Actually I think that in this case the 'chromimu' configuration should >> look for chromium-browser if chromium is not found. > > Even better might be to go straight for chromium-browser, to avoid > confusion with ancient versions of chromium-bsu.
More precisely, we should look for chromium-browser first, and if not found then use chromium. The fall-back to chromium is, I think, needed because I suspect the binary was renamed in Debian only. Can somebody with some other distribution confirm that chromium is called chromium there?
-- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta