From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:39:58 GMT
Subject: Re: Patchbombing or not, that is the question
Message-ID: <AANLkTinGNURJVdnQjw5BvR1tkoOdCRdgY2poYb8PFH2R@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101127183421.GA2131@burratino>

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>
>> Actually I think that in this case the 'chromimu' configuration should
>> look for chromium-browser if chromium is not found.
>
> Even better might be to go straight for chromium-browser, to avoid
> confusion with ancient versions of chromium-bsu.

More precisely, we should look for chromium-browser first, and if not
found then use chromium. The fall-back to chromium is, I think, needed
because I suspect the binary was renamed in Debian only. Can somebody
with some other distribution confirm that chromium is called chromium
there?

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta