Re: git merge --abort? [was: Re: [PATCHv4 00/21] git notes merge]
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2010, 15:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTimzryq2Qa5sZNmXVY5Z1epg5Zxe3TMk9CX_+VX8@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <201010221712.06059.johan@herland.net>
Heya,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:12, Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> wrote:
> Yes, that makes sense to me, especially if we make a 'git merge --abort' > synonym. Alternatively, we can make 'git merge --abort' check for > MERGE_HEAD, and then defer to 'git reset --merge', while leaving 'git > reset --merge' as-is.
ACK to that. I think people using 'git reset --merge' know what they're doing, and should be able to clobber their changes (viz. `git reset --hard`), while 'git merge --abort' should do more handholding and make sure you don't lose any data. (If I had more time I'd implement that 'core.nodataloss' flag...)
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier