Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] rev-parse: add tests for git rev-parse --flags.
- From
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 25, 2010, 16:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTimW6shzyLqW-Ok_+kopjnq5t+AVxW0WRrmjkgQp@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimj--jZdX++=ZjF3A0HE11FbkgVb2gs3ADVEGvx@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 13:33, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote: > >> + : >expected && > > We've been dropping the ":>foo" style in favor of ">foo" in other > tests. There's no need for the ":". > >> + echo -X > expected && >> + echo -q > expected && >> + echo -X > expected && >> + echo --no-flags > expected && > > Maybe some echo implementations don't like flag-like params, and we need: > > printf "%s\n" "-X" > > here. I don't know whether that's the case. >
Thanks for the review.
My latest revision incorporates this feedback, although I didn't use extra quotes around -X. (e.g. I wrote printf "%s\n" -X)
jon.