Re: git as an sfc member project
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2010, 20:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTim7gC6ckrN-yFGyT4KgPz2v9B+UqLBZj7GzaMpK@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTim0EH0Qvwe6NHMBt831jHZV85=TSAx8k2ABnTdd@mail.gmail.com>
Heya,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:19, Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I think a committee of at least 3 people and at most 5, any of whom > can be a benevolent SFC liasion, is fine. As far as selection goes, > the committee can elect or remove a member through a majority vote, > and should base its decisions based on surviving contributions to the > code base, but shouldn't be tied to that (just in case someone > contributes a lot of good code and then becomes a jerk).
Sounds good. Something like Junio (Duh), Shawn (based on commit count), Peff (Handled GSoC money last year), and Jonathan Nieder (based on list activity)?
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 13:06, Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> OK, 10% does seem reasonable given they are saving us the taxes... or more. :-)
LGTM.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier