Re: git as an sfc member project

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 22, 2010, 22:59 UTC
Message-ID: <7vocalkf53.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=6tvmTAfdyL-sKBsq+4OpFaQpZWT66ANESNapj@mail.gmail.com>

Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> I think a committee of at least 3 people and at most 5, any of whom
> can be a benevolent SFC liasion, is fine.  As far as selection goes,
> the committee can elect or remove a member through a majority vote,
> and should base its decisions based on surviving contributions to the
> code base, but shouldn't be tied to that (just in case someone
> contributes a lot of good code and then becomes a jerk).

Just a datapoint from quick "blame -C -C -w" run as of 1.7.3.2, counting surviving lines, 7 top from each area, excluding Documentation/RelNotes.

** Everything else **

77212 Junio C Hamano 41388 Shawn O. Pearce 32676 Linus Torvalds 28618 Johannes Schindelin 22120 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 20190 Paul Mackerras 15518 Marius Storm-Olsen

** t/ **

59572 Junio C Hamano 9646 Johannes Schindelin 7606 Eric Wong 7342 Jonathan Nieder 5733 Jeff King 4978 Shawn O. Pearce 4828 Johan Herland

** Documentation/ **

22092 Junio C Hamano 10830 J. Bruce Fields 5566 Christian Couder 3904 Shawn O. Pearce 3664 Thomas Rast 3388 Johannes Schindelin 2888 David Greaves

** contrib/ **

7180 Junio C Hamano 3960 Shawn O. Pearce 3378 Alexandre Julliard 2948 Marius Storm-Olsen 2668 Aneesh Kumar K.V 2624 Simon Hausmann 1254 Matthias Urlichs