Re: [PATCH] reset: update help text
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2011, 12:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTiknvWE9Fe3u88Jbis4Cgxd5ubqaR6MzYOJZ-AtM@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110329210457.GA14031@elie>
2011/3/30 Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
Show 19 quoted lines
> The description does not make it obvious to me how these two (--merge > and --keep) differ. I think the intent of the options are: > > --keep: > start working on a different commit, carrying over local changes > (like "git checkout") > --merge: > return to <commit>, cancelling a merge-like operation that > creates some unmerged and some clean index entries > > Maybe something along these lines could be ok starting point? > > OPT_SET_INT(0, "keep", &reset_type, > "move to <commit>, carrying over local changes in working tree", > KEEP), > OPT_SET_INT(0, "merge", &reset_type, > "return to <commit>, cancelling failed merge or cherry-pick", > MERGE), >
To be honest, I have no idea what the above describes. I read 9bc454d (reset: add option "--keep" to "git reset" - 2010-01-19) and figured that --keep is like --merge except that "git diff" before and after the reset is exactly the same, is it? I have never used --keep before.
-- Duy