Re: Creating remote branch called HEAD corrupts remote clones
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 22, 2011, 12:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTikmbWkpjioARZrmySpLM8t7kqCX0v1+NKibk_ar@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk4hyp38i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > >> I don't fully understand the issue, so excuse me if this is totally >> wrong, but wouldn't a rule like 'you can't create a branch for which >> there's already a symbolic ref' do the trick? > > But whose symbolic ref are you checking against? Your own, or ones in > somebody else's repository that you haven't recently updated from?
The local ones. That means that somebody can't create a 'HEAD' branch locally, and can't push a 'HEAD' branch either, as the remote server would already have a 'HEAD' symbolic link. And actually, if for some reason I have a FOO_HEAD, and I fetch a branch called bob/FOO_HEAD, obviously the local symbolic ref without namespace should take precedence.
-- Felipe Contreras