Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 1, 2011, 14:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTikLJXyQH8au5SpfvAMgq3sA1PqKsG16GK0YcCFB@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1v2reywi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> But how many people may be impacted this way? ... >> Or accept that evolution is painful and go with current plan, which I'm OK too. > > So even though you raised a concern on possible pains during the > migration, you think that the migration plan outlined would be the > least bad one?
I only see two ways. The 'new command' approach only delays the transition until a later (user decided) point. There's no guarantee that I (user) would make a good decision to switch. Plus the outlined plan looks simpler. Yes, it seems better.
-- Duy