From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:15:21 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7v1v2reywi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> But how many people may be impacted this way? ... >> Or accept that evolution is painful and go with current plan, which I'm OK too. > > So even though you raised a concern on possible pains during the > migration, you think that the migration plan outlined would be the > least bad one? I only see two ways. The 'new command' approach only delays the transition until a later (user decided) point. There's no guarantee that I (user) would make a good decision to switch. Plus the outlined plan looks simpler. Yes, it seems better. -- Duy